On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 10:12:07AM +0100, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> On Monday 07 March 2016 15:21:07 Matthias Schiffer wrote:
> [...]
> > By the way, the netns support is another good reason to switch from the
> > debugfs interfaces to a netlink-based interface (as the netlink interface
> > wouldn't need userspace applications like batctl to be aware of the
> > namespaces). I guess I should finally finish the patches I started writing
> > for that...
>
> So what is your suggestion here? Should the namespace support for namespaces
> be rejected and you send in your netlink implementation patches? Or should
> this patch be merged and be removed (together with the rest of the debugfs
> stuff) when your netlink support is integrated?
Hi Sven
I would expect the debugfs code to stay around for a while, so people
have a chance to upgrade their batctl and alfred to the new API. We
probably need one release with both?
Andrew
