On 13/03/18 16:20, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> On Dienstag, 13. März 2018 16:02:34 CET Antonio Quartulli wrote:
> [...]
>> Another observation: do these attributes need to be DAT specific? or can
>> we just define (or reuse) a generic HWADDRESS attribute that we might
>> already be using somewhere else (i.e. for TT)?
> I've asked myself the same but we have BLA_- and TT_ADDRESS and these are 
> named in a way which connects them to these specific subsystems. Using one of 
> them for DAT seems to be a little bit odd.

Oh ok. In this case it makes sense to have DAT specific attrs.

(if we wanted to, we could still rename all the attrs pointing to the
very same data type and unify them, but I don't have a strong opinion
about it at this time).


Antonio Quartulli

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to