Please avoid HTML e-mails. On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Ehud Gavron <gav...@wetwork.net> wrote: > > It is not up to us to "...deal with regulatory considerations..."
No, you see, that's wrong because no one else was, we started getting upstream support from companies only once we found decent solutions for regulatory. So as much as you want to bark that we don't need to deal with them I can already prove to you that you were wrong. If you don't you simply don't get support, if you do, then you accelerate the pace of adoption for Linux. One way or another the changes have to happen, how you manage to get the changes done will highly affect how soon you'll get support. > The "best we can do" is code, and that's what coders do. The lawyers can do > what lawyers do.* And what do you want to code? Piece of shit reverse engineered quality code? I guarantee you if you get proper vendor support the quality of the drivers improves considerably. > and we're ahead of others because we're not wasting our time on legal crap. No, we are ahead because we envision the path to enhancing radio capabilities and dynamic communication. The regulatory solutions in place in Linux help with regulatory considerations but as a side effect it also paves the way for next generation radio technologies. Luis _______________________________________________ b43-dev mailing list b43-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/b43-dev
