Rafal,
-----Original Message----- >From: Rafał Miłecki <[email protected]> >Sent: Dec 10, 2010 11:33 AM >To: [email protected] >Cc: Larry Finger <[email protected]>, Hauke Mehrtens ><[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected] >Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] b43: N-PHY: update init tables > >W dniu 10 grudnia 2010 20:09 użytkownik <[email protected]> napisał: >> Rafal, >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >>>From: Rafał Miłecki <[email protected]> >>>Sent: Dec 9, 2010 10:36 PM >>>To: [email protected] >>>Cc: Larry Finger <[email protected]>, Hauke Mehrtens >>><[email protected]>, [email protected], >>>[email protected] >>>Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] b43: N-PHY: update init tables >>> >>>W dniu 10 grudnia 2010 03:26 użytkownik <[email protected]> napisał: >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>From: Rafał Miłecki <[email protected]> >>>>>Sent: Dec 9, 2010 6:06 AM >>>>>To: [email protected] >>>>>Cc: Larry Finger <[email protected]>, Hauke Mehrtens >>>>><[email protected]>, [email protected], >>>>>[email protected] >>>>>Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] b43: N-PHY: update init tables >>>>> >>>>>2010/12/8 <[email protected]>: >>>>>> Larry, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>From: Larry Finger <[email protected]> >>>>>>>Sent: Dec 7, 2010 12:00 PM >>>>>>>To: [email protected] >>>>>>>Cc: Hauke Mehrtens <[email protected]>, [email protected], >>>>>>>[email protected] >>>>>>>Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] b43: N-PHY: update init tables >>>>>>> >>>>>>>On 12/07/2010 01:49 PM, [email protected] wrote: >>>>>>>>> One reason is that these tables changed from non-zero to zero values >>>>>>>>> between >>>>>>>>> Broadcom driver 4.174.64.19 and 5.10.56.46. As they might change >>>>>>>>> again, I think >>>>>>>>> we should retain the full version. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is there a way to check for version of the driver? >>>>>>>> This way whoever uses old one won't be screwed... >>>>>>> >>>>>>>That will not be a problem as no older version of b43 works at all with >>>>>>>b43. To >>>>>>>help you understand this change, when the 4.174.64.19 Broadcom driver was >>>>>>>reverse-engineered, the tables had non-zero values. Rafel later compared >>>>>>>the >>>>>>>trace dumps of b43 with the latest version of wl and found that the >>>>>>>values are >>>>>>>now zero. When I rechecked driver 5.10.56.46, I found them to be zero >>>>>>>there as >>>>>>>well and changed the specs. >>>>>> >>>>>> Well, it maybe feasible to keep the old values and check >>>>>> the version of the driver, since you are saying yourself >>>>>> that the value might be changing in the future. >>>>>> Maybe for couple of releases only? >>>>> >>>>>Sorry, but I don't understand that at all. What do you mean by version >>>>>of the driver? What driver? >>>> >>>> #if B43_VERSION <= x.x.x.x >>>> // table initialized to some values >>>> #else >>>> //table initialized to 0's >>>> #endif >>> >>>You want to put condition checking b43 version in... b43 driver? I >>>can't follow you. >> >> Yes. >> And what you can't follow? >> >> For historical purposes and to better understand the changes and ease the >> debugging I proposed this addition. >> Besides if for some reason in future versions Broadcom will decide to return >> to >> the same values for init tables, the changes will be very simple. > >So I guess you meant using "#if 0" for commenting old values? > >I guess we could do that instead deleting old values, but fortunately >it's git so we always can browse history and restore old values >without problems :) Well, after 5 or 6 month will you remember the commit that introduced the change? Yes, you can browse the history, but it will be an extra effort to find it. I understand that the code will be bigger in size, but if it takes just adding 2 lines of code comparing to looking thru history and then copying the values to sources. Thank you. > >-- >Rafał _______________________________________________ b43-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/b43-dev
