W dniu 6 lipca 2011 17:40 użytkownik Michael Büsch <[email protected]> napisał: > On Tue, 5 Jul 2011 23:54:08 +0200 > Rafał Miłecki <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <[email protected]> >> --- >> drivers/net/wireless/b43/bus.c | 100 >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> drivers/net/wireless/b43/bus.h | 3 + >> drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c | 7 +++ >> 3 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/bus.c b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/bus.c >> index 4200713..f56604f 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/bus.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/bus.c >> @@ -23,6 +23,106 @@ >> #include "b43.h" >> #include "bus.h" >> >> +/* BCMA */ >> +#ifdef CONFIG_B43_BCMA >> +static inline int b43_bus_bcma_bus_may_powerdown(struct b43_bus_dev *dev) >> +{ >> + return 0; /* bcma_bus_may_powerdown(dev->bdev->bus); */ >> +} > > Why is this inline? > You can't inline and take a pointer of the function at the same time. > (The compiler will workaround this by generating multiple versions of > the function, of which at least one is not inline). > So remove it, please. Same below...
I didn't know about any such a limitation. Just for sure: did you really mean "pointer of the function"? Cause my function is taking pointer of the struct, not pointer of function. -- Rafał _______________________________________________ b43-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/b43-dev
