On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 10:30:31 +0200
Rafał Miłecki <[email protected]> wrote:

> Old masks were causing ugly, delayed lock ups.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_ht.c |   10 +++++-----
>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_ht.c 
> b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_ht.c
> index 2982103..0cc293a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_ht.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_ht.c
> @@ -277,12 +277,12 @@ static void b43_phy_ht_op_software_rfkill(struct 
> b43_wldev *dev,
>               b43err(dev->wl, "MAC not suspended\n");
>  
>       if (blocked) {
> -             b43_phy_mask(dev, B43_PHY_HT_RF_CTL1, ~0);
> +             b43_phy_mask(dev, B43_PHY_HT_RF_CTL1, 0);
>       } else {
> -             b43_phy_mask(dev, B43_PHY_HT_RF_CTL1, ~0);
> -             b43_phy_maskset(dev, B43_PHY_HT_RF_CTL1, ~0, 0x1);
> -             b43_phy_mask(dev, B43_PHY_HT_RF_CTL1, ~0);
> -             b43_phy_maskset(dev, B43_PHY_HT_RF_CTL1, ~0, 0x2);
> +             b43_phy_mask(dev, B43_PHY_HT_RF_CTL1, 0);
> +             b43_phy_maskset(dev, B43_PHY_HT_RF_CTL1, 0, 0x1);
> +             b43_phy_mask(dev, B43_PHY_HT_RF_CTL1, 0);
> +             b43_phy_maskset(dev, B43_PHY_HT_RF_CTL1, 0, 0x2);
>  
>               if (dev->phy.radio_ver == 0x2059)
>                       b43_radio_2059_init(dev);

Why are we using mask/maskset here at all, if the mask is zero?
You could just use phy_write.

(And mask() with ~0 should always ring a bell anyway, because it does
nothing except for possible side effects of the register read/write).

_______________________________________________
b43-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/b43-dev

Reply via email to