On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 22:16:26 +0200 (CEST) Thommy Jakobsson <thom...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Sat, 20 Apr 2013, Michael Büsch wrote: > > > On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 21:47:10 +0200 (CEST) > > Thommy Jakobsson <thom...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > And I think you need to set ring->current_slot to the value of > > > > ring->ops->get_current_slot(). > > > > Not 100% sure, though, since it is years since I worked on that code. > > > > > > > Is that really needed? They should already be the same since the device > > > has thrown the underflow interrupt > > > > Hm not sure. But should be easy to verify. > I did check it in the beginning when I was testing the patch, just printed > the indexes in the kernel log. But of course if there is a race condition > it could be hard to catch. Ok. I don't think there should be a race. Thanks for checking. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ b43-dev mailing list b43-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/b43-dev
