This could be a bit confusing to see warning about lacking support for
5 GHz band if your device supports 2.4 GHz only.

Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zaj...@gmail.com>
---
John: even I was quite confused to see this warning on my BCM5357. I
suspected b43 incorrectly detected my WiFi as 5 GHz capable. I think
that proposed behavior makes more sense.
Do you think it's OK/worth to take it for 3.16?
---
 drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c
index 8aeef10..27dc343 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c
@@ -5268,14 +5268,16 @@ static int b43_wireless_core_attach(struct b43_wldev 
*dev)
        b43_supported_bands(dev, &have_2ghz_phy, &have_5ghz_phy);
 
        /* We don't support 5 GHz on some PHYs yet */
-       switch (dev->phy.type) {
-       case B43_PHYTYPE_A:
-       case B43_PHYTYPE_G:
-       case B43_PHYTYPE_N:
-       case B43_PHYTYPE_LP:
-       case B43_PHYTYPE_HT:
-               b43warn(wl, "5 GHz band is unsupported on this PHY\n");
-               have_5ghz_phy = false;
+       if (have_5ghz_phy) {
+               switch (dev->phy.type) {
+               case B43_PHYTYPE_A:
+               case B43_PHYTYPE_G:
+               case B43_PHYTYPE_N:
+               case B43_PHYTYPE_LP:
+               case B43_PHYTYPE_HT:
+                       b43warn(wl, "5 GHz band is unsupported on this PHY\n");
+                       have_5ghz_phy = false;
+               }
        }
 
        if (!have_2ghz_phy && !have_5ghz_phy) {
-- 
1.8.4.5


_______________________________________________
b43-dev mailing list
b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/b43-dev

Reply via email to