On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 10:40:41 -0600, Larry Finger wrote: > On 11/16/18 7:04 AM, Dennis New wrote: > > I'm still not sure exactly what the problem was. The error message > > "Invalid argument -22" was also less than helpful. Any way that > > message can be made more helpful to avoid this confusion? > > Of course that is possible, but if every error message were expanded > to full text, Linux would become as bloated and slow as Windows, and > probably not run on hardware old enough to have a BCM4318 network > card. > > By the way, the low-number error codes are available in > /usr/include/asm-generic/errno-base.h, and the entire list is at > http://www-numi.fnal.gov/offline_software/srt_public_context/WebDocs/Errors/unix_system_errors.html, > > or do a search for "Linux error codes". > > Error number -22 is "Invalid argument". >
But I don't think the problem actually was an invalid argument. (And I already knew that, it told me that in the error message.) The exact same command worked after I updated the regulatory stuff, I think. _______________________________________________ b43-dev mailing list b43-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/b43-dev
