On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 8:30 PM Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> Using uninitialized_var() is dangerous as it papers over real bugs[1]
> (or can in the future), and suppresses unrelated compiler warnings (e.g.
> "unused variable"). If the compiler thinks it is uninitialized, either
> simply initialize the variable or make compiler changes. As a precursor
> to removing[2] this[3] macro[4], just initialize this variable to NULL.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200603174714.192027-1-gli...@google.com/
> [2] 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFw+Vbj0i=1tgqcr5vqkczwj0qxk6cernou6eedsuda...@mail.gmail.com/
> [3] 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ca+55afwgbgqhbp1fkxvrkepzyr5j8n1vkt1vzdz9knmpuxh...@mail.gmail.com/
> [4] 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFz2500WfbKXAx8s67wrm9=yvju65tplgn_ybynv0ve...@mail.gmail.com/
>
> Fixes: 399145f9eb6c ("mm/debug: add tests validating architecture page table 
> helpers")
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org>
> ---
>  mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
> index e45623016aea..83c9e88a052a 100644
> --- a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
> +++ b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
> @@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ static int __init debug_vm_pgtable(void)
>         phys_addr_t paddr;
>         unsigned long vaddr, pte_aligned, pmd_aligned;
>         unsigned long pud_aligned, p4d_aligned, pgd_aligned;
> -       spinlock_t *uninitialized_var(ptl);
> +       spinlock_t *ptl = NULL;

It looks like the address of ptl is passed to pte_alloc_map_lock.  It
looks like pte_offset_map_lock unconditionally assigns through that
pointer before reading.  So this could be left uninitialized, but
initializing it doesn't hurt.
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulni...@google.com>

>
>         pr_info("Validating architecture page table helpers\n");
>         prot = vm_get_page_prot(VMFLAGS);
> --

-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers

_______________________________________________
b43-dev mailing list
b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/b43-dev

Reply via email to