From: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>

There is a spelling mistake in a comment. Fix it.

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43legacy/main.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43legacy/main.c 
b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43legacy/main.c
index f64ebff68308..eec3af9c3745 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43legacy/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43legacy/main.c
@@ -391,7 +391,7 @@ void b43legacy_tsf_read(struct b43legacy_wldev *dev, u64 
*tsf)
         * registers, we should take care of register overflows.
         * In theory, the whole tsf read process should be atomic.
         * We try to be atomic here, by restaring the read process,
-        * if any of the high registers changed (overflew).
+        * if any of the high registers changed (overflowed).
         */
        if (dev->dev->id.revision >= 3) {
                u32 low;
-- 
2.31.1


_______________________________________________
b43-dev mailing list
b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/b43-dev

Reply via email to