From: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>

clang warns about an unpacked structure inside of a packed one:

drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/b43.h:654:4: error: field data within 'struct 
b43_iv' is less aligned than 'union (unnamed union at 
/home/arnd/arm-soc/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/b43.h:651:2)' and is 
usually due to 'struct b43_iv' being packed, which can lead to unaligned 
accesses [-Werror,-Wunaligned-access]

The problem here is that the anonymous union has the default alignment
from its members, apparently because the original author mixed up the
placement of the __packed attribute by placing it next to the struct
member rather than the union definition. As the struct itself is
also marked as __packed, there is no need to mark its members, so just
move the annotation to the inner type instead.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/b43.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/b43.h 
b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/b43.h
index 9fc7c088a539..67b4bac048e5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/b43.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/b43.h
@@ -651,7 +651,7 @@ struct b43_iv {
        union {
                __be16 d16;
                __be32 d32;
-       } data __packed;
+       } __packed data;
 } __packed;
 
 
-- 
2.39.2


_______________________________________________
b43-dev mailing list
b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/b43-dev

Reply via email to