Johannes Berg <johan...@sipsolutions.net> writes:

> On Mon, 2023-12-18 at 12:58 +0100, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
>
> Dunno, I'm not super involved with this but ...
>
>> +++ b/drivers/bcma/Kconfig
>> @@ -1,12 +1,7 @@
>>  # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> -config BCMA_POSSIBLE
>> -    bool
>> -    depends on HAS_IOMEM && HAS_DMA
>> -    default y
>> -
>>  menuconfig BCMA
>>      tristate "Broadcom specific AMBA"
>> -    depends on BCMA_POSSIBLE
>> +    depends on HAS_IOMEM && HAS_DMA
>
> [...]
>>  config BRCMSMAC
>>      tristate "Broadcom IEEE802.11n PCIe SoftMAC WLAN driver"
>> -    depends on MAC80211
>> -    depends on BCMA_POSSIBLE
>> +    depends on HAS_IOMEM && HAS_DMA && MAC80211
>>      select BCMA
>
> to me it kind of seems more obvious for example in this case to say
> "depend on BCMA_POSSIBLE and select BCMA" rather than open-coding the
> BCMA dependencies both here and in BCMA? Now granted, they're rather
> unlikely to _change_, but it still seems more obvious?

I was thinking the same. Lukas, is there a specific reason why you want
to change this or this just something you noticed by chance?

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

_______________________________________________
b43-dev mailing list
b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/b43-dev

Reply via email to