Le 17/07/2024 à 19:57, Michael Büsch a écrit :
On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 22:21:13 +0200
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
static void lpphy_rev0_1_write_gain_table(struct b43_wldev *dev, int offset,
- struct lpphy_tx_gain_table_entry data)
+ const struct lpphy_tx_gain_table_entry data)
{
u32 tmp;
@@ -2356,7 +2356,7 @@ static void lpphy_rev0_1_write_gain_table(struct b43_wldev *dev, int offset,
}
static void lpphy_rev2plus_write_gain_table(struct b43_wldev *dev, int offset,
- struct lpphy_tx_gain_table_entry data)
+ const struct lpphy_tx_gain_table_entry data)
{
u32 tmp;
@@ -2383,7 +2383,7 @@ static void lpphy_rev2plus_write_gain_table(struct b43_wldev *dev, int offset,
}
void lpphy_write_gain_table(struct b43_wldev *dev, int offset,
- struct lpphy_tx_gain_table_entry data)
+ const struct lpphy_tx_gain_table_entry data)
{
if (dev->phy.rev >= 2)
lpphy_rev2plus_write_gain_table(dev, offset, data);
@@ -2392,7 +2392,7 @@ void lpphy_write_gain_table(struct b43_wldev *dev, int
offset,
}
These three changes look like they are not necessary.
Correct. I'll send a v2.
CJ
_______________________________________________
b43-dev mailing list
b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/b43-dev
