Hi StarBrilliant, StarBrilliant <[email protected]> writes:
> In case I didn't explain clearly in my previous mail, I think the > current cost function is not suitable for long-range links: > > current_cost = hop/(1-loss)^2 + RTT > > I want to suggest a new cost function that may be better: > > my_new_cost = (hop+RTT) * sqrt(clip(loss)) > > I wish we could have more flexible configurations for balancing > tunneled networks. This is a very interesting idea. Do you have plans to develop a set of test and benchmark criteria to objectively assess the effectiveness of different cost functions? I have got a feeling that it is hard to argue on which is better without a performance test. Yours, Benda _______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
