> > On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 12:01:54AM -0700, Dave Taht wrote: > I get that bandwidth figure a lot for wireguard. I care about latency > far, far more under a full bidirectional load. Having got base wifi so > much better, and the edge connections sqm-scripts massively better, I > am wondering if wireguard got on the stick yet? > > I wrote about this problem in an early version of wireguard here: > http://blog.cerowrt.org/post/wireguard/ > > As of kernel 4.4 (?) ipsec does take advantage of the fq_codel hash. > the before latency was 100+ms in the tunnel for voip, 2ms after.
I can confirm that fq_codel works with Wireguard tunnels just fine. The latency added by a tunneled hop is around 1-2ms. Here's some iperf data, but not as latency focused as you would probably like. https://forum.altheamesh.com/t/althea-performance/44/3 _______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
