Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <[email protected]> writes: > On 25 October 2018 23:14:20 CEST, Dave Taht <[email protected]> wrote: >>On 10/25/18, Juliusz Chroboczek <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> the box doing the injection ate a cpu for all of the 5 minutes the >>>> test ran >>> >>> How did the BIRD box behave? >> >>On the bird front, I'm thinking this is essentially wrong... it should >>match babel for wired links (96). Does bird have the ability to >>distinguish between wired and wireless links (inflating txcost as >>babeld does) > > Only through manual config, currently. I'm hoping to add auto-detection at > some point...
Still, 96? Better? Henning had pointed us at olsrv2's implementation of a netlink interface for wifi channel detection at one point. odhcpd is using a much easier API to netlink than that did, but I don't know when it runs out of steam. In my now overflowing list of things to do in my spare time was to try converting all of kernel_netlink.c over to that api while preserving the semantics of my babeld-atomic branch.... > > -Toke > > _______________________________________________ > Babel-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users _______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
