On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 12:46 PM Dave Taht <[email protected]> wrote: > > since, what the heck, I have 7 different versions of babel in the lab, > I figured why not add in the unicast branch on two boxes and see what > else breaks. > > An oddity, I think, is I see one box making a mh-request unicast, and > the other box seems to respond with a mcast (?). Cap here: > > http://www.taht.net/~d/unicast.cap > > Is there fun, happy, new config options I can enable to enable way > more unicast? :)
ah, ok, so the nlogn branch I've been running was derived from the unicast branch? which in turn was derived from the rfc-bis branch? and I've been running that all along? So all that's left is hmac? and dtls? yea! I added default unicast true to one of those boxes, and yea! lots of unicast! lots of ns solicit and response. Route transfers. over unicast. yea! > > next up, is sending much smaller numbers of routes and veriyfing > correctness... and getting it down to a few less versions. However, I > now have enough lab boxes to basically do > interop between a lot of versions, I figure adding 1.5, 1.6, 1.7.1 to > the mix would be useful? > > and I *gotta* go climb a few trees. > > > -- > > Dave Täht > CTO, TekLibre, LLC > http://www.teklibre.com > Tel: 1-831-205-9740 -- Dave Täht CTO, TekLibre, LLC http://www.teklibre.com Tel: 1-831-205-9740 _______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
