David Schinazi <[email protected]> writes: > I feel strongly against making anything but SHA-256 mandatory to > implement.
> It will delay publication Not if there's already a draft we can simply refer to (like with SHA-256); I do agree that we shouldn't be trying to pull Blake through the IETF process if there isn't... > and not improve the interoperability story. Why not? If it's not MTI you risk the case where you get to pick between "good performance on weak devices" and "interoperability with RFC-only implementations". -Toke _______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
