> > > Why not? If it's not MTI you risk the case where you get to pick between > "good performance on weak devices" and "interoperability with RFC-only > implementations". >
Where are these "RFC-only implementations" of Babel? Remember the IETF does not have a protocol police, MTI is purely guidance. Implementors build what they (or their customers) need for their use-case. Implementors will add Blake if they need it, not based on whether it's MTI or not. Lastly, remember that this is a security solution, so you do NOT want to interoperate with a future theoretical implementation, because that will not have the keys. Adding any new node in the network will require a provisioning step, and that step ensures the new node supports the required features.
_______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
