> Ok. Perhaps this port should be recommended in the man page also ... Yep.
>> ssh -L 33123:ip6-localhost:33123 ... > Anyway: It doesn't work either. On the router I get messages > "channel 3: open failed: connect failed:" whenever I try to start telnet > and telnet says: Weird. Works for me. Are you sure you switched to 33123? >> darcs get http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~jch/software/repos/BabelTool > Hm, does it work with free java? (ie packages included in lenny-main) I haven't tried. I see no reason why it shouldn't work with openjdk, I'd be surprised if it worked with gjc. >> The port is hard-wired to 33123. > Hm, makes it difficult to connect to several routers at the same time... Alex, PJ, any comments? Or are you too busy with your compilers project ;-) >> [...] since SIT cannot carry IPv4, so it means that all the >> infrastructure will need changing if you ever decide to switch to hybrid >> routing. I strongly recommend GRE > I'll keep that in mind. But if we ever use babel to route real traffic > (ideas which already brought some heated mails into my inbox) then the > tunnels need to go away: While I fully agree, I'd still recommend you go for GRE. Transitions are always more messy than expected, let's make it as easy as reasonable. Juliusz _______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
