Juliusz Chroboczek <[email protected]> writes: >> Because babel itself does not know the complete topology. > > What I have considered doing at some point (when we get around to > rewriting BabelDraw) would be to have the controller simultaneously > connected to multiple Babel nodes, and build as much of the topology as > it can get from those nodes.
I have been reading the rfc for babel (haven't really looked at much code yet, just setup a couple of machines last week). I remember some discussion of the telnet interface discussed, but... Could the controller build up the topology via route request messages (section 3.4.10 of the rfc) unicast with a prefix of 0, instead? > Juliusz > > _______________________________________________ > Babel-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/babel-users > -- Dave Taht http://the-edge.blogspot.com "Most people know my father as the despotic warlord that rules europa but he does have his musing sparky qualities. Do you know he really loves waffles?" - Gil Wulfenbach _______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
