someone want to provide a synapse breakdown of the thoughts and advantages this brnach might/might not have/offer
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Benjamin Henrion <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Antonio Quartulli <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi all, Hi Juliusz, > > did you write any document about the diversity-aware strategy > > adopted by babelz? > > > > I (maybe everyone:)) am very interested in it! > > Code is there: > > > http://zumbi.netgroup.uniroma2.it/~clauz/rsyncs/wbmv3/results/babel-z.tar.gz > > I am gonna test it first in the simulator based on hwsim, and then on > a small testbed of foneras once I get them back from the WBM. > > Best, > > -- > Benjamin Henrion <bhenrion at ffii.org> > FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403 > "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software > patents in Europe, the patent establishment changed its strategy. > Instead of explicitly seeking to sanction the patentability of > software, they are now seeking to create a central European patent > court, which would establish and enforce patentability rules in their > favor, without any possibility of correction by competing courts or > democratically elected legislators." > > _______________________________________________ > Babel-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/babel-users >
_______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
