On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek
<[email protected]> wrote:
>> However, it appears that some routes get established in the routing
>> table which are not pingable. I think this may be due to some radios
>> receiving but not transmitting.
>
> Babel tests for 2-way reachability, so this cannot happen.
>
>> However, pinging something appearing in the routing table results in
>> no returns and also, I can not ping the IPV6 interface address over
>> the link.
>
> You mean the link-local address? The one in fe80:: ? Using ``ping6 -I
> whatever''? If so, it's not a Babel issue.
>
> Juliusz
>
>
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek
<[email protected]> wrote:
>> However, it appears that some routes get established in the routing
>> table which are not pingable. I think this may be due to some radios
>> receiving but not transmitting.
>
> Babel tests for 2-way reachability, so this cannot happen.
>
Hmm, that is what I am seeing. I definitely can not get to those
addresses shown in the routing table.
>> However, pinging something appearing in the routing table results in
>> no returns and also, I can not ping the IPV6 interface address over
>> the link.
>
> You mean the link-local address? The one in fe80:: ? Using ``ping6 -I
> whatever''? If so, it's not a Babel issue.
The link local address, yes. OK, I'll see if I can figure that out.
The IPV6 addresses in the Routerstation seem a bit suspicious.
Don
Sorry, I did not include the list.
Don
_______________________________________________
Babel-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
