> I try to associate a neighbour address (fe80::whatever) to a router id. > 1) Does that make sense? (ie. is it an injection?)
I think you got the (English) syntax wrong. You're trying to map link-local address -> router-id which does make sense. (Your sentence above implies the opposite.) > 2) Assuming it makes sense, I thought a reliable way to recover the > injection was looking at routes with refmetric = 0: the "via" field > would give me the interface, it is a neighbour since refmetric = 0 (is > that correct?), and announced by router "id". Yep. (It's correct but not complete.) > bar/32 96 0 02:18:f3:ff:fe:98:e5:34 fe80::3cc9:fe4d:23a5:9b07 alpha > no That looks like a bug. On alpha the route looks as so: 192.168.4.27/32 metric 96 refmetric 0 id 02:18:f3:ff:fe:98:e5:34 seqno 28754 age 44 via alpha-gamma neigh fe80::b47c:87a4:6f83:d378 nexthop 192.168.4.27 (installed) which makes sense, but on huponomos it says 192.168.4.27/32 metric 96 refmetric 0 id 02:18:f3:ff:fe:98:e5:34 seqno 28754 age 26 via alpha neigh fe80::3cc9:fe4d:23a5:9b07 nexthop 192.168.4.25 (feasible) which is broken. Now alpha is running a very old version of OpenWRT, and hence a very old version of babeld (I've no longer got a working cross-compiler for alpha), so I'll migrate alpha to a more recent version to see if we can reproduce it. -- Juliusz _______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
