>> However the problem of dealing with ipv6's various forms of addressing has >> O(n) complexity, it seems, so multiples of tables seem needed.
Dave, you're confused, as usual. There's no "problem" with the multiple forms of addressing in IPv6. The problem is with the ingress filtering policies of your upstream ISPs. The clean solution is to use a single upstream ISP, or to use PI space and make sure your upstreams accept packets sourced with your address. If you cannot do that, put a full mesh of GRE tunnels between your Internet gateways, and put a bunch of source policy rules to make sure each packet gets routed through the right gateway for its source address. Assuming the case of n upstreams, that's n gateways, and n-1 tunnels originating on each gateway. Since there's no reason to have more than two upstreams (the cheap one and the reliable one), that's very reasonable. > I was trying to come up with a sane set of filters using the filter > rules, and failed. Please try again. -- Juliusz _______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
