On Tue, 27 Mar 2012, Outback Dingo wrote:

I dont think its about closing any of the code off, I think its more about how someone can simple add other added parameters or restrictions on the code base which was originally a more open unrestricted license

Please see:

  http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=quagga.git;a=blob;f=babeld/LICENCE

as should be clear from this file, we have NOT tried to close off the code to the standalone, MIT/X11 licensed version of babeld which is independent of Quagga: we will require that contributions to Quagga babeld/ be MIT/X11 licensed.

We have followed these SFLC guidelines, which I believe are best practice:

  https://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2007/gpl-non-gpl-collaboration.html

regards,
--
Paul Jakma  [email protected]  twitter: @pjakma  PGP: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
"Today's robots are very primitive, capable of understanding only a few
 simple instructions such as 'go left', 'go right', and 'build car'."
 --John Sladek

_______________________________________________
Babel-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users

Reply via email to