>> Denis, why is this not used also by the RIP code? This would make it >> possible to use Linux-style unnumbered interfaces with RIP, and would >> make RIP behave the same as RIPng.
> Well, there may be multiple places where RIP nexthops are matched > against connected prefixes. Perhaps, it's better to convert these > checks conditional rather than drop them, because coupling an > open-minded RIP router with a traditional one will likely create > one-way routes. Could you please clarify? I don't think that third-party announcements are allowed in RIP. -- Juliusz _______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
