On 2012-08-02, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: >> I still think that a sample babeld.conf should be shipped with the babel >> source code. > > Well, the message I'm trying to send is that babeld "just works" -- you > don't need a babeld.conf for normal usage, you're only supposed to use > one if you have special needs.
Well, this is not my experience so far. I would very much like to agree
there, but so far, to announce routes I needed at least:
redistribute allow
Maybe a lesser incantation would have worked. I think this is related to
the fact that my routes don't have a "proto" assigned to them, after
reading the mailing list post.
>> I volunteer for writing such a config file based on the above, if no one
>> else will, and if the idea is accepted here.
>
> I'll be glad to include a sample conf file in the source distribution,
> but I'd like it to be called "babeld.conf.sample", to start with
> a comment that says that no babeld.conf file is necessary in normal
> usage, and to consist of comments only. For an example, please see
>
> http://git.wifi.pps.jussieu.fr/?p=polipo.git;a=blob;f=config.sample
Sure, that sounds reasonable.
I'll work on something.
A.
--
For every complex problem, there is an answer that is clear, simple -
and wrong.
- H.L. Mencken
pgpVEdR1iU3bR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
