> >> after a while dirty routes disappeared, it didn't seems deterministic > >> how the problem appear, but heavy packets loss seems improve probability > >> of problem
> > That's very strange. What happens when you shut down babeld cleanly > > (using a plain kill, not kill -1 or -9)? > As you can see [0] babeld is killed with plain kill not -1 or -9 what > happen is that the unreacheable routes remain in the table as i said in > the other thread Gioacchino, I strongly suspect we're mis-interpreting the results here, something like interpreting Linux route cache as actual routes. Unless the spurious routes cause a problem, I suggest you ignore this. -- Juliusz _______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
