Maybe they can do it as long as the tunnel destination is different on both sides?
Henning On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 8:31 PM, Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Baptiste Jonglez <[email protected]> wrote: > >> 2) I would guess that the NAT has been setup with your host as the > >> "DMZ" or "bastion" host, and all unknown packets are being forwarded > >> to that host. > > > The hosts are not in any kind of DMZ. > > > Modern NAT are intelligent enough to forward this type of tunnels > > correctly (the same goes for IP-in-IP or SIT tunnels). > > Seriously... ?!? > > I guess I can imagine that they might do this when only one such tunnel > exists and the tunnel is intiated from behind the NAT, but how can they demux > multiple of such tunnel, or figure out where to send packets when the host > behind did not send first? > > -- > ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ > ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [ > ] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails > [ > > > _______________________________________________ > Babel-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users -- We began as wanderers, and we are wanderers still. We have lingered long enough on the shores of the cosmic ocean. We are ready at last to set sail for the stars - Carl Sagan _______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
