I agree, a feature check would be much better than a version check (we have to do the feature check anyways!).
Unfortunately the feature is buggy in a lot of kernels and I am not sure there is a way to check this. Henning Rogge On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Juliusz Chroboczek <[email protected]> wrote: >> I've got this in the next version of cerowrt and it looks like it is also >> targetted for -stable. > > Excellent. > >> I see the babels branch has been quiet since jul 12, and I figure >> mattieu and juliusz are still in recovery from ietf. > > I'm actually just back from a wonderful holiday (wikipedia Masuria), > helping Baptiste write up the RTT stuff (it's almost ready), and > finishing writing up some older stuff. I'm dying to get back to > hacking, but I'm trying to be a responsible scientist instead. > >> So I hope this can be made to work, my question though is what sort >> of sane way can working ipv6_subtrees be done at runtime be determined? > > Henning's suggestion is reasonable, but I'd much prefer to use > a direct method -- so it doesn't break with vendor kernels. > > -- Juliusz > > _______________________________________________ > Babel-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users -- We began as wanderers, and we are wanderers still. We have lingered long enough on the shores of the cosmic ocean. We are ready at last to set sail for the stars - Carl Sagan _______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
