On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 09:11:12 +0100, Gabriel Kerneis wrote: > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:19:43PM -0500, Charles N Wyble wrote: > > Um. What is confusing about this? > > Different behaviour depending on a seemingly unrelated flag, wouldn't work > with > daemon managers that refuse double-fork (such as runit). On second thought, > if > it really needs to be tweaked, a command-line flag (disabled by default) > seems a > better option. > And really if sending a different signal is all that difficult, you're doing it wrong.
Cheers, Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
