>> 1. babel-rtt >> ************ >> Baptiste recently changed the packet format,
> I had tried to make an eloquent argument for supporting very tiny > fractions of a second. And you won -- that's the whole point of the new packet format. >> 2. babels >> ********* >> >> This is much more complex. There's a lot of subtle interactions. [...] >> No ETA for merging. > Well, having one branch rather than two (RTT in mainline, babels with > RTT also) would be nice. Yeah. -- Juliusz _______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
