On Jul 1, 2014 3:31 PM, "Juliusz Chroboczek" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > (I am concerned about mis-parsing stuff), > > Don't worry too much, it's bad for your complexion. This is a distance > vector protocol, if we mis-parse something, you'll get an extra route in > your routing table, which will timeout within seconds. > > A more serious potential problem is that when Babel fails to parse > a (known) TLV, it discards the rest of the packet. That's because some > TLVs set state that is relevant to the rest of the packet. But I don't > think it'll matter much. > > We'll keep your concerns in mind, Dave, when we write the parser for the > new TLV, we'll do our best to make it even more fascist than
Soon please. Cero is essentially frozen now, barrier breaker is freezing soon too. > > > I'd prefer it be a rusting Ford XB Falcon , but... > > Hmm... That's the car in Starsky and Hutch? Mad max. Love that mill! > > -- Juliusz
_______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
