On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Dave Taht <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Juliusz Chroboczek > <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Merge atomic updates from olsrd code? >> >> I stand by my previous opinion: >> >>> Ausgeschlossen. Last time I tried, I got a number of complaints that it >>> broke operational networks. >> >> Sorry Dave, but I'd rather be developing new features and writing proofs >> than dealing with unreproducible bug reports. > > OK, Agreed. > > I'll do it (one day) and let you know. I would like to have a good > test for showing differences in behavior for the new FIB stuff anyway, > and that will have to wait til linux-4.1 stabilizes and I have another > pair of 8 1gigE setups going. (presently that's an 8 port edgerouter > and 8 port rangeley box)
The funny thing is that I had been working with olsrd2 for more than a year before the problem came up that atomic overwriting of IPv6 routes wasn't working for older kernels. The only thing I know (at the moment) is "debian Wheezy: BAD" and "Ubuntu 14.10: GOOD". IPv4 atomic overwriting has been working forever... at least 5-8 years. Maybe even during Kernel 2.4 times. Henning Rogge _______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
