Le 2015-04-18 05:26, Dave Taht a écrit :
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 8:04 PM, Dave Taht <[email protected]> wrote:
While I am happy to see this switchover...

A) it would have be nice if you did not break the build, and had

Note that I did *not* push to the for-14.07 branch, only to master (in case it make any difference).

checked for dependencies on babels and fixed those too. there was only
one... but it happened to be on code (hnetd) I am testing tomorrow
morning at 10AM PDT. A find . -type f -name Makefile | xargs grep
babels revealed that only hnetd depended on it.

Sorry about that, I reverted the deletion of babels.

B) It is not clear what else broke with hnetd with this change to
babels from babeld. The two sets of init and config scripts had grown
to differ quite a bit.

Mostly, in my understanding, because babels never picked up the clean-up by Baptiste.

C) You missed adding ipv6-subtrees support to the init script, and as
all of openwrt has ipv6_subtrees support in the kernel, the default
should be true for this os, not the default in babel, which is false.

This wasn't in babels as far as I can tell. Does it matter for people not doing source-specific stuff? Can't we assume that those who do will set it up? I'm a bit nervous to add this change by default right now, especially knowing how some openwrt users sometimes cherry-pick packages from snapshots while still running a kernel from an old release (they shouldn't, but they do).

D) you did not incorporate any of the source specific openwrt
babels init and config mods like

        append_parm "$cfg" 'src_ip' 'src-ip'
        append_parm "$cfg" 'src_eq' 'src-eq'
        append_parm "$cfg" 'src_le' 'src-le'
        append_parm "$cfg" 'src_ge' 'src-ge'

Ah, I had warned people on this very list about changes to filter rules, and then I managed to miss them because they weren't in the release notes. My mistake, will fix.

Speaking of which, would you prefer to have free-form filter rules in the config instead (while keeping backwards-compatibility of course)?

E) And there was a longstanding patch in babels that I hope made babeld,
or was solved some other way...

0001-Allow-routes-with-source-128-for-SAS-on-Linux.patch

I'm not applying patches I don't understand, but I'm happy to include it if Juliusz approves it.

It would be best if someone could revert commit:

23e20773d8b5c90dad99702e030ce86ccf3344f3

Done.

--
Gabriel Kerneis

_______________________________________________
Babel-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users

Reply via email to