Hello!

On 13. 06. 2015 23:06, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> But why do you limit the JSON object to known key/value pairs?  I would
> just do

I guess I just wanted to rename some keys and make sure that they stay
fixed. But I agree with your point about easier extensibility in the
future. So if the existing keys will never change (unless the reported
protocol version in the first line changes?), I can update the module to
simply reuse the same key names.

>> Yeah, link-local addresses of the current node are not reported by Babel
> 
> Do you want me to add that?

The reason why this would be nice is that it would limit the link-local
addresses to only those which are actually used by babeld. Because
currently I just have to report them all (I could cross-reference that
with interfaces in babeld configuration, but I think this would be too
much added complexity, so I just report all of them).


Jernej

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Babel-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users

Reply via email to