Instead of adding a covering route, and explicitly denying other routes from being distributed, would it be possible to have a smarter filter with syntax like
"redistribute local prune" That would cut something like this down from: 2601:696:8300:2cb0:dc9f:abff:fe06:1a24 via fe80::28c6:8eff:febb:9ff0 dev eth0 proto babel metric 1024 2601:696:8300:2cb0::/64 via fe80::28c6:8eff:febb:9ff0 dev eth0 proto babel metric 1024 2601:696:8300:2cb1::/64 via fe80::28c6:8eff:febb:9ff0 dev eth0 proto babel metric 1024 2601:696:8300:2cb2::/64 via fe80::28c6:8eff:febb:9ff0 dev eth0 proto babel metric 1024 2601:696:8300:2cb0::/60 via fe80::28c6:8eff:febb:9ff0 dev eth0 proto babel metric 1024 to just 2601:696:8300:2cb0::/60 via fe80::28c6:8eff:febb:9ff0 dev eth0 proto babel metric 1024 -- Dave Täht worldwide bufferbloat report: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/results/bufferbloat And: What will it take to vastly improve wifi for everyone? https://plus.google.com/u/0/explore/makewififast _______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
