I just did a pull of your head, built it, started a new babel... waited 2 minutes (I was assuming the calculation for the routerid had changed?)... and did not get a working route to elsewhere until I tried talking to another route.
(note I did not update the other 2 babelds in operation on this network from the old openwrt "babels") I get working routes locally, but the next box upstream refused any connection. d@ganesha:~/git/babeld$ ip route default via 172.26.22.224 dev wlan0 proto babel onlink 76.102.227.25 via 172.26.22.224 dev wlan0 proto babel onlink 172.26.0.0/16 dev wlan0 proto kernel scope link src 172.26.65.1 172.26.16.0/24 via 172.26.22.224 dev wlan0 proto babel onlink 172.26.16.1 via 172.26.22.224 dev wlan0 proto babel onlink 172.26.17.0/24 via 172.26.18.224 dev wlan0 proto babel onlink 172.26.17.1 via 172.26.22.224 dev wlan0 proto babel onlink 172.26.18.0/24 dev wlan0 proto kernel scope link src 172.26.18.225 172.26.19.0/24 via 172.26.22.224 dev wlan0 proto babel onlink 172.26.20.0/24 via 172.26.18.224 dev wlan0 proto babel onlink 172.26.22.224 via 172.26.22.224 dev wlan0 proto babel onlink 172.26.128.0/27 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 172.26.128.18 192.168.1.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.202 d@ganesha:~/git/babeld$ ssh [email protected] fails. Weirdness - after I tried connecting to here traceroute to 172.26.19.1 (172.26.19.1), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 172.26.22.224 102.543 ms 102.529 ms 103.409 ms # 100ms???? 2 172.26.19.1 104.586 ms 107.553 ms 107.572 ms stuff started to work. I went back to the older version and got the same result for over 2 minutes but it did eventually work. Then I went back to the newer one waiting over 2 minutes... and that too, eventually did work. running ubuntu 3.19.0-15-generic, ath9k wifi. Babeld.conf is: ipv6-subtrees true out if vpn6 ip 0.0.0.0/0 deny in if vpn6 ip 0.0.0.0/0 deny I am going to put this down to a bug not in babel. (100ms to my next hop? wtf?) And I am getting on a plane transiting paris in the next few minutes. See you in prague! ~ On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Juliusz Chroboczek <[email protected]> wrote: >> This means that all the interfaces on a node will have a link-local >> address? That's a very bad idea. > > This was meant to say "the same link-local address". > > _______________________________________________ > Babel-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users -- Dave Täht worldwide bufferbloat report: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/results/bufferbloat And: What will it take to vastly improve wifi for everyone? https://plus.google.com/u/0/explore/makewififast _______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
