Hi! On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek <[email protected]> wrote: > If I understood correctly, they're not trying to support wide-scale > roaming -- the roaming domains will be small and well-defined.
Yes. But there is also another issue I have which is related to this topic but not completely. And that is that at such "big venue" locations with multiple nodes, where you want roaming, you also want nodes to be on different channels, because otherwise they are interfering with each other too much. So how you keep the mesh nature of your network while still providing this multi-channel roaming-enabled pockets of the network? Mitar -- http://mitar.tnode.com/ https://twitter.com/mitar_m _______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
