> Well, it would be better if babel checked to see if the (sometimes
> read-only) sysctl value was already correct, instead of blithely
> trying to write it.
Agreed.
Toke, wouldn't it be better instead of your patch:
1. to follow Dave's suggestion by default;
2. to add a new config file option that doesn't set any sysctls
unconditionally?
I'm also dubious about the command-line option -- shouldn't this be just
a config file directive, which is usable with -C?
-- Juliusz
_______________________________________________
Babel-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
