> Then we can have the following order of routing tables on routers: > > babel > olsr > babel_default > olsr_default
Mitar, I'll be glad to implement the hack that you require, but let's please think whether we can manage to avoid it. What's wrong with putting both OLSR and Babel routes into a single table, and using a higher kernel priority for OLSR routes? If you do that, the most-specific rule will cause host routes to be preferred to default routes, and the kernel priority will be used to prefer routes from one routing protocol to the ones from the other when they have equal specificity. Babeld's kernel priority can be tuned using the "kernel-priority" config file directive. I have no idea whether something similar can be done with olsrd. Henning? -- Juliusz _______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
