On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek <[email protected]> wrote: >> scratch that. IFF_RUNNING and the ipv6 link local address does get set >> for adhoc mode, so long as you are not also fighting with >> networkmanager or something else flaky happens.
>> so... yea! the panda card will work in adhoc on the rpi2. It's nice to >> know that at least one 16 dollar stick sort of works. > > Excellent. (Yes, NetworkManager is evil.) Well better integration for adhoc + network manager would be nice. /me hides I may have had networkmanager interfering with my life in a couple other tests along the way, after documenting everything that you can do wrong, I'll go write up a matrix of how to get it right( er) later. >> the throughput is abysmal, however. (7-9mbit in my test) > > What about latency? Both without load and under load? without: 3-36ms with load: 500ms-3sec for one way traffic. http://www.taht.net/~d/panda/3secofdatabackedupat10mbit.png (route flap? interference? rate control?) more flent data in that dir. We are nowhere near being able to handle usb wifi as good as the ath10k fq_codel proof of concept was. (we never figured out how to make usb ethernet better either) My goal was to get a bunch of itty bitty boxes to generate loads with while we improved the ath10k, ath9k, and got distract ( for those that haven't seen the glory of fq_codel at the right layer of the wifi stack, see: http://blog.cerowrt.org/post/fq_codel_on_ath10k/ ) > > -- Juliusz > > > _______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
