Hello all, I have two routers (A and B) and a client (C) in the following topology: A -- B -- C
Router A had address 10.0.200.1 and has a default route, which babel shares using src-prefix 10.0.0.0/16. Router B has address 10.0.100.1 and serves the prefix 10.0.100.0/24 to it's clients. Client C has the address 10.0.100.100 and doesn't run babel. Router B has a route for the served prefix: root@B:~# ip route show [...] 10.0.100.0/24 dev wlan0-1 proto kernel scope link src 10.0.100.1 And babel creates a source specific routing table for the source specific default route. However the route for the served prefix is not placed in this routing table: root@B:~# ip rule show 0: from all lookup 128 1: from all lookup local 100: from 10.0.100.0/16 lookup 10 32766: from all lookup main 32767: from all lookup default root@B:~# ip route show table 10 default via 10.0.100.1 dev wlan0 proto babel onlink 10.0.200.1 via 10.0.200.1 dev wlan0 proto babel onlink Router A shows the route for the served prefix in both the default table and the source specific table. My question is: Shouldn't the route for 10.0.100.0/24 appear in the source specific table of router B? Thanks in advance, Casper Meijn
_______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
