I guess I'm confused. I had thought that we would not use ip rules at all with IPV6_SUBTREES in play. I'm also a little concerned about hitting a rule table limit or some other conflict.
This is with babel head, which seems to be duplicating the rules with the subtrees. d@dancer:~/public_html/newcake$ ip -6 rule show 0: from all lookup local 100: from 2001:558:6045:bd:1ccf:b9bb:e8da:2c77 lookup 10 101: from 2601:646:4103:56c0::/60 lookup 11 102: from 2601:646:4100:72ab::/64 lookup 12 103: from 2001:558:6045:bd:edb1:91de:b10d:5cb9 lookup 13 104: from 2601:646:4180:d9f::/64 lookup 14 32766: from all lookup main An older source specific babel I have only has stuff like this in it, no rules. d@dancer:~/public_html/newcake$ ip -6 route show | grep from default from 2001:558:6045:bd:1ccf:b9bb:e8da:2c77 via fe80::16cc:20ff:fee5:64c2 dev eno1 proto babel metric 1024 pref medium default from 2001:558:6045:bd:edb1:91de:b10d:5cb9 via fe80::ba27:ebff:fec9:3c08 dev eno1 proto babel metric 1024 pref medium default from 2601:646:4103:56c0::/60 via fe80::16cc:20ff:fee5:64c2 dev eno1 proto babel metric 1024 pref medium default from 2601:646:4180:d9f::/64 via fe80::ba27:ebff:fec9:3c08 dev eno1 proto babel metric 1024 pref medium 2601:646:4103:56c0::/60 from 2601:646:4103:56c0::1a6 via fe80::120d:7fff:fe64:c992 dev eno1 proto babel metric 1024 pref medium 2601:646:4103:56c0::/60 from 2601:646:4103:56c0::/64 via fe80::120d:7fff:fe64:c992 dev eno1 proto babel metric 1024 pref medium 2601:646:4103:56c0::/60 from 2601:646:4103:56c8::/61 via fe80::120d:7fff:fe64:c992 dev eno1 proto babel metric 1024 pref medium -- Dave Täht Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software! http://blog.cerowrt.org _______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
