On Sun, 2008-04-13 at 16:41 -0700, Paul Kmiec wrote: > > This help significantly in improving stability of > BackgrounDRb and code > > written on top of packet. So what you guys think? Shall we > go for this > > change? > > It sounds good to me. Anything that helps stability and > improves > memory usage will always get my vote. > > I agree. > > Paul
Okay folks, I have updated git repo of just packet with latest changes wherein I have removed fork in favour of fork and exec: http://github.com/gnufied/packet/tree/master The only catch is, now we need some kinda runner to run our workers since exec takes argument in form of string only. For example: exec "packet_worker_runner ##{t_worker_name}:{worker_read_end.fileno}:#{worker_write_end.fileno}:#{option_dump_length}" One option we have is to have "packet_worker_runner" as installed executable when user installs packet gem. Any other ideas? _______________________________________________ Backgroundrb-devel mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/backgroundrb-devel
