On 5/21/08, Jim Salinas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for replay David, I just did a search and only found a mention of drb > in a unit test and from digging around backgroundrb seems to have been > rewritten recently without drb. If this incorrect, someone please correct > me. :-)
BackgrounDRb has not used DRb for sometime, the name is just a bit misleading now ;) It was switched to use a event framework a while ago and more recently has switched to the pure Ruby 'packet' library. As far as I can tell packet does not support SSL, but I am far from an expert on the subject. I assume you have some sensitive data you need to pass to BackgrounDRb from Rails that you don't want in the clear? Maybe you could just use the database to pass that information, only passing database IDs or unique tokens to BackgrounDRb for it to load the information. Of course depending on your database the information may still get passed around in the clear... Ryan _______________________________________________ Backgroundrb-devel mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/backgroundrb-devel
