On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 10:25 -0700, Raghu Srinivasan wrote: > Hi Hemant - no, I am not using thread_pool right now. I do have two > separate workers like you and Ryan Leavengood suggested - one for the > batch process and the other for the live/web user initiated process - > which by the way works out great, thanks!. > > How are other folks handling 1000s of RSS refreshes? Via BDRb - or > something else? Is BDRb really the best tool for what I am trying to > do? I'd really appreciate if others could share their experiences. >
okay, then it shouldn't be a problem. Can you try git version of backgroundrb as suggest in following link and report us back? http://gnufied.org/2008/05/21/bleeding-edge-version-of-backgroundrb-for-better-memory-usage/ _______________________________________________ Backgroundrb-devel mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/backgroundrb-devel
