On 04/28/2015 02:25 PM, Eliad Peller wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Mathy Vanhoef <vanho...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Arend van Spriel <ar...@broadcom.com> >> wrote: >>> On 04/28/15 01:56, Mathy Vanhoef wrote: >>>> >>>> This updates the dependency library to handle RC versions up to 39. For >>>> example, coccinelle version "1.0.0" is now correctly treated as being >>>> higher >>>> than version "1.0.0-rc24". >>> >>> >>> This one is duplicate to the patch Eliad submitted [1]. Any reason for >>> choosing rc 40? >> >> I missed that patched. My reasoning was that previously at least the Linux >> kernel went up to rc 39 with 2.6.39. So 40 should be a good limit to support >> most cases. >> > note that 39 in this case is the "sublevel", not the "extraversion". > > Eliad.
I will take your patch Eliad. There are so many magic numbers in this code it probably has to get cleaned up, a warning for such a case like we have it now would also be nice. Hauke -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
